Parliamentary Question: The performance of national equality bodies in promoting and strengthening equal treatment

Parliamentary Question

In February 2017, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz (PPE) submitted a written question (E-001025-17) to the European Commission regarding ‘The performance of national equality bodies in promoting and strengthening equal treatment‘. The question reads as follows:

EU legislation obliges Member States to set up national equality bodies, which are then required to promote equal treatment and combat discrimination on the grounds covered by EC law, such as gender, race and ethnicity, and, on a voluntary basis, on the grounds of age, sexual orientation, religion or belief and disability. All of the Member States have successfully established national equality bodies, but there is great variety in their independence and competences and, consequently, their effectiveness in carrying out the principal tasks. Moreover, there are no specific guidelines for Member States on how these equality bodies should operate and there is limited oversight of their performance.

  1. How does the Commission monitor and assess the work of national equality bodies in terms of fulfilling their principal tasks, which mainly consist of raising awareness about anti-discrimination law and legal assistance for victims?
  2. How many and which Member States have decided to extend legal protection in their national law beyond the grounds required by EC law (gender, race and ethnicity) to the optional grounds of age, religion or belief, disability and sexual orientation?
  3. Does the Commission collect data on the legal representation of individuals in discrimination cases mediated by the national equality bodies?

Reply from the European Commission

Reply E-001025/2017 given by Ms Jourová on behalf of the Commission on 22 May 2017 reads as follows:

In most Member States, the mandate of equality bodies extends to all the grounds of discrimination covered by EU equality legislation. This goes beyond the requirement of the directives(1), which only concerns race, ethnic origin and sex. As the Commission set out in its joint report on the application of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC(2) in 2014, this was the case in 22 Member States(3), while in 15 Member States grounds going beyond those protected by EU Directives were covered as well.

In January 2017, the European Network of Equality Bodies (Equinet) published a factsheet which provides a detailed overview of the grounds covered by Equinet member equality bodies(4).

The Commission has been monitoring and will continue to scrutinise closely Member States’ compliance with the requirements of the directives on this aspect. It ensures that each equality body has the required mandate and powers, but also that it effectively performs all the tasks set out in EU legislation.

In this respect, the Commission relies on information provided by Member States and by diverse stakeholders, such as the Equinet and the European Network of Legal Experts in Gender Equality and non-Discrimination. This has already led to the opening of formal infringement proceedings against Finland, Belgium and Slovenia, which resulted in changes in the national legislation and the concerned equality bodies.

(1) Directives 2000/43 EC, 2006/54/EC and 2004/113/EC.
(3) i.e. all Member States apart from Denmark, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Spain and Finland at the date of the report.

See also Parliamentary Question from 2015 on Clear standards for equality bodies to perform their duties in EU Member States, and EU demands for equality bodies in accession countries

Members' Publications

Belgium: Number of new discrimination cases at Unia rises by 20 percent

Unia received no fewer than 5,619 reports of discrimination in 2016. These led to 1,907 case files being opened concerning possible discrimination, hate speech or hate crimes. This represents an increase of 20 percent from 2015.

Equality Bodies

Lithuania: Religion teacher must not discriminate against gay people in class

On 19th June, 2017 Agneta Skardžiuvienė, Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson of the Republic of Lithuania, found that the school Telšiai Žemaitė Gymnasium violated the Law on Equal Treatment of the Republic of Lithuania by not ensuring the absence of discrimination and material promoting discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation in its curriculum. It has been confirmed that one of the school’s teachers, during a moral (religious) studies lesson, gave information that degraded gay individuals, promoting a negative attitude toward them and encouraging discrimination.

Meet the National Equality Bodies (#MeetNEBs)

Croatia: Ombudswoman

Our Croatian colleagues at the Ombudswoman’s Office are the next members to take over the Equinet Twitter account (@equineteurope) as part of our #MeetNEBs campaign.

External publications

Debunking myths on Muslim women and feminism

Given the continued debates and misconceptions around both Muslim women and feminism, the European Network against Racism (ENAR) is debunking some of the more common stereotypes about feminism and Muslim women in Europe in order to promote a shared understanding of equal treatment in a diverse society.

Cluster - Research and Data Collection

1st Meeting of the Cluster


Agenda 1st meeting Cluster


Summary 1st meeting Cluster

Power-point Presentations

Power point presentations 1st meeting Cluster

Cluster - Research and Data Collection

Background Documents

Presentation leaflet

Equinet Cluster RDC

Members' Publications

Northern Ireland: Key Inequalities in Housing and Communities

The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland recently released a ‘Statement on Key Inequalities in Housing and Communities in Northern Ireland’. This highlights their assessment of inequalities and differences in housing experiences faced by equality groups across the Section 75 equality categories in Northern Ireland.